Andy – Day 2
The day began, with a healthy option, in the form of a continental breakfast. I knew today was going to be another action packed day and so I wanted a good nutritious start. My system just could not cope with another serving of ghastly scrambled eggs and putrefied pseudo-bacon.
My first breakout, was a very good practical hands on session on how to create an e-learning centre. I managed to begin a framework of e-activities. This entailed hyperlinking web pages and activities for groups within my class to which I can add to later. Although the session was too short to finish, at least I have something to take back to the class and engage them in some meaningful e-learning activities straight away.
Next up, I was cajoled, forsaking my intended breakout, into a promised “earth shattering experience” in the form of
Tony Ryan. I am pleased to report, it was the right choice. Once again I had the pleasure of listening to an expert, not only share ideas, but also suggest how to implement good digital pedagogy in the classroom. At the end of the session, the three of us, unashamedly rushed the stage and asked the “Great Man” to pose for a photo with the Clendon Park Trio. He obliged unreservedly.
(I would like at this point, to point out Mel W is actually dictating as I pace back and forth across the great expanse of the luxurious surrounds that is my suite. It takes approximately 3 minutes to pace my suite.)
The day soured a little, however, and as the song goes “Two out of three, ain’t bad”. (Angry pacing now.)
The last breakout, entitled “Developing self managing students using a co-constructed timetable”, unfortunately should have been entitled “Memoirs of Superman’s brilliant, so, so modern, decile 9, Anglo-Saxon, revolutionary educational classroom spiel.” In other words, I couldn’t relate to Mr. Christchurch, and his self gloating importance in regard to how fantastically his class operates. For example, “If a kids wants to get some books from the local library, all I need to do is call up a parent and get them to take them down. I love breaking the rules.”
My point here is we can all share the positives about how we run our classrooms, but I was really hoping for once again some good practical ideas of how to benefit my kids’ achievement through empowerment and co-construction of content. Rather it felt like, Gordon Ramsey showing us around his restaurant and beaming about how clean and shiny his kitchen is. Call it pedagogy envy. I think we’ll leave it there.
Day two ended with some fanastic dancing at the conference dinner.
4 Comments »
Leave a Reply
-
Archives
- February 2009 (20)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Haha sometimes we need to look past the delivery to see what can be a good idea. I’m sure on further reflection you will be able to see what he was trying to say and how it relates to our school… or not. Can’t win them all
Comment by Leanne | February 26, 2009 |
How cool to go to a Tony Ryan presentation, I’m sure he was very inspiring and able to create some ripples!! Bonus at CPS is that you don’t need to call a parent you can just jump on the bus and go your self!! Would love photographic evidence of conference dancing is that a self reflection on ones dancing or feedback that was recieved?????
Comment by Danielle | February 26, 2009 |
LOL Andy you and Tony Ryan look like father and son!!!
Comment by Danielle | March 1, 2009 |
Andy – regarding “Mr Christchurch” – vanity is an obscene element that creeps into some teachers’ personalities. In fact quite a few people are in teaching to have control over others it seems to me. Perhaps this is why alot of lawyers become teachers in their later years, or because they have exploited humans for their own financial gain – and then have the audacity to try and redeem themselves through what they must consider ‘altruism’ (again another form of vanity). I’ve made my money through human exploitation, now I’ll take a cut in pay and help people – in a sad attempt to rebalance my karma. When I was at teachers college a few moons ago – there was a rumour that went ’round that there was a ‘top gun’ teacher that had impressed everyone. Obviously it wasn’t me, and I resented this term ‘top gun’ or ‘young gun’ teacher. It emphasised what I fear about education that it’s a hirachical structure where – ironically – the people we are hoping to develop are kept at the bottom – the students. This term ‘top gun’ (actually I think it was ‘young gun’) threw up motifs of war, policing and control.
You’re right in your analysis of questioning as a teacher tool – it is essential, especially the questioning of ourselves and our motivations as teachers (or as I prefer ‘facilitators’); students should be given the control, and we must facilitate this. Teachers college had pretensions of this (facilitation, reflection) – yet reinforced, on the other hand, blind hirachical control (at times). Well I say teachers college – this is rather harsh, perhaps I am talking more about an established educational culture. There were some awesome examples of authentic facilitators as teachers at the campus I was at. Anyway I agree with your blog – let’s give control over to the students – overthrow controlling guns and push for individually beyond hirachies established to keep the redundant in power… well that’s my take on it anyway.
Comment by Kieron | March 2, 2009 |